Bible Resources Our Congregation Special Events Contacts

Congregational Bulletin Board

Youth News & Activities

Weekly Bulletin Articles

Evangelistic Works

Bible Class Schedule

Photo Gallery

Our History



Dripping Springs Members


















Dripping Springs Weekly Bulletins

Thou SHalt Not Judge!

Jesus  lived only about thirty-three years, and His preaching covered only about a three year period. Much of that time was spent preparing His disciples for their work after He returned to His Father in heaven.

His sermon on the mount dealt with such subjects as a person’s happiness, influence, worship and his relationship with the law and the gospel, money – and how to relate to people in the world.

One of His best-remembered, yet most abused, subjects is found in Matthew 7:1-5. (It would be helpful if you would read that passage before continuing this material). Did you read all five verses? If you did not, you could easily come away with an erroneous viewpoint.

Note what is not taught here:

  1. Jesus does not forbid the making of judgments of every kind. In this same chapter, verse 15, Jesus says “Beware of false prophets,” and tells how to determine whether one is a “false” prophet or teacher. You can hardly “beware” of a false prophet/teacher if you are forbidden to compare his teaching with Christ’s, thus making a judgment.

    Jesus’ disciples must of necessity make judgments, and such that will not violate verses 1-5. Every day will bring Christians face to face with decisions, judgments regarding behavior and speech, and Matthew 7:1-5 will be helpful and in harmony with that necessity.

  2. Christians are not forbidden to find and discern truth. In 1 John 4:1 and 2 John 1:9-11 Christians are told to determine what is truth and to rebuke teachers of false doctrine. Christ has sent all of us on a great mission,  and telling and discerning truth is a major part of that mission. No one can be pleasing to God who does not know truth or has no respect for truth. It is God’s truth that will “make you free,” and we must and can “know” that truth, John 8:31-32.

    Jesus did not contradict Himself! We must not “call good evil, or put darkness for light,” Isaiah 5:20. That, however, does not allow us to assume the place of God when we are ill-prepared to fulfill that task. He also says “…woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes,” Isaiah 5:21. Our attitudes and actions must be pure. We must not bid “God-speed” to those who refuse to teach God’s truth. Therefore, we must compare what men teach with what the Bible teaches. That shows respect for God and for His word.

Note what is taught in 7:1-5:

Jesus forbids caustic, unkind, unfair judgment by His people. He also demands that one who corrects another look first to his own life, his own behavior. It must have been a humorous saying to those who heard it first. He describes one who has a “beam” (log, ASV, or plank, NKJV) in his eye, and that man is in the process of rebuking, ridiculing a man who has a small speck in his eye. While this makes use of a form of hyperbole, or exaggeration, it should be easy to see what is meant. Is Jesus not saying this:

 “Before you try to rid others of their sin, you would be wise first to rid yourself of your own faults. Then, and only then, will you be in a position to help others.”

When we are beset with sin, with obvious weaknesses, we can seldom see or know how to give assistance to those whose problems are much less obvious or serious than ours. It should be easy to see this principle without prompting, but “there is none so blind as he who will not see.”

Unfortunately, when we are in such a condition, there is the strong temptation to call attention to the weaknesses of others in an attempt to take the eyes of others off our own. Poor motives eventuate in poor choices and poor behavior. Jesus, in this context, emphasizes the need for us to be fair, to be long-suffering with others, looking first to our own life before we criticize others.

Should Christians  correct others?

In Romans 3:23 we read that “all have sinned, and come short of the  glory of God.”  If another is in sin, should we not want to reconcile them to God? Should we merely allow them to go their merry way, go on living in sin, failing to realize the consequences of such behavior?

Here we see the difference in showing another the way back to God, back to the hope of heaven, and merely condemning them, just pointing out their faults without  caring for their soul. We know the difference is our love for their soul.

In Galatians 6:1-2 we read:

“Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted. Bear ye one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ.”

We should see the difference between this attitude and that of one who is anxious to “judge” another without “considering [him]self”? Yes, we should correct and “restore” others. But we must do so with their best interests in our heart.

Carl B Garner


“Weigh thy Neighbor in the same Balance with thyself.”

Thomas Fuller, 1731


“Judge not according to appearance, but judge righteous judgment.”

John 7:24

 
“Judge every man in the most favorable light.”

The Talmud

 



"I AM THAT I AM

These are the words God spoke to Moses when describing who He was (Exodus 3:14). They indicate that God has always existed and will continue to exist. However, this affirmation is not enough evidence for some men. For thousands of years there have been those who deny that God exists. It is a topic that has been subject to debate for just as long and continues today under the guise of evolution and science.

Can one prove God exists? Empirically, no. Or, in other words, by using our five senses, the existence of God can neither be proven nor disproven. That does not mean, however, that there is an absence of evidence for God’s existence. There are many arguments one could use to build a case for God. These arguments use logic and the fundamental laws of nature as their basis for making a point.

One argument simply states that all design must have a designer. Since it can be shown that in all of nature there is design, the architect is concluded to be God. Another argument uses the logic of “cause and effect” which states that any end result has to have an originating source. The universe is evidence of an effect, creation by God is attributed as the cause. One could also use the argument of morality. This shows man as having within himself an innate sense of “ought” which causes him to behave differently from the animals. Since this cannot be attributed to some evolutionary cause, it is reasonable that God placed it within man.

The above are but a few of the evidences for God’s existence. These arguments rely on a person to be clear-minded in his thinking. If a person opposes the possibility of there being a God, then any evidence that is presented to him will simply be dismissed. It is not difficult to understand this motive because if God does not exist, then man can do whatever he wants without fear of judgment. Men may reject that God exits, but God has declared, “I AM THAT I AM.” The evidence to support this claim is overwhelming.

Troy Spadlin

Comments or suggestions: comments@ds-churchofchrist.org
Dead links, typos, or HTML errors: corrections@ds-churchofchrist.org