Bible Resources Our Congregation Special Events Contacts

Congregational Bulletin Board

Youth News & Activities

Weekly Bulletin Articles

Evangelistic Works

Bible Class Schedule

Photo Gallery

Our History



Dripping Springs Members


















Dripping Springs Weekly Bulletins

The "Bull's eye" Method of Bible Study

Some of you may recall the story of Zeb, the young boy in Alabama who was renowned for his marksmanship. He was considered the finest rifle shot in the entire state. The evidence of his talent was seen in the hundreds of circles painted on barns, rocks, trees and houses, each with a bullet hole right in the center of the bull’s-eye. The population was amazed at his talent, and he was the subject of many a conversation around a camp-fire on a cold winter night.

If there was anything negative about this famous phenomenon, it was his boasting, and that was his eventual downfall. There was one skeptical member of the community who grew tired of Zeb's bragging. He decided to follow him into the hills one day to discover the true measure of his fabled accuracy. Here is what he saw:

The young man would take aim at a tree or a barn, fire the shot, and then with a piece of chalk, meticulously draw a circle around the bullet hole. At his very best he was an average shot as a rifleman, but his trickery with a piece of chalk made it seem as though he was truly a marksman.

This same story could be told about several different issues, but it also applies to many who study the Bible. They "fire the shot" (or decide what they believe) and then they "draw a circle” in the Bible around   the  verse   that   seems   to  "prove" their view. Some may call this   "proof-texting," but regardless of what you call it, it is nothing more than the “art” of concocting a doctrine, and then trying to make the Bible agree with it. This "marksmanship" is popular among many modern Bible readers. It may make the person feel good about his/her belief, but it does not make the belief true.

It is certainly not wrong to compare what you believe with what is found in the Bible. In fact, that is just what we must do, but this "bull’s-eye" method is completely backward. It deceives a man into thinking he is in God's favor when he is not. Please note Proverbs 14:12.

In Martin Luther's day, the people were so disgusted with the "works salvation" taught by Roman Catholicism that they rebounded all the way to the point at which they believed in salvation by "faith alone." Sure enough, they found Romans 3:28 saying,

"Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law."

In their eagerness to deny the need for an obedient response to the gospel, they overlooked the words of Romans 6:3-4, 17-18.

"Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life...But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you. Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness." Romans 6:3-4, 17-18

In their determination to find a doctrine that demands no action on the part of the individual, some have turned to:

"By grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God."   Ephesians 2:8

Lost is the realization that the book of Acts tells us that those same Ephesians "were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus," Acts 19:5. Obviously, being saved by "grace through faith" did not cancel out the obligation of the Ephesians to be baptized into Christ [see Mark 16:16, 1 Peter 3:21 and Galatians 3:27].

   The following statement is worthy of our consideration:

"If you believe only what you like in the Gospel, and reject what you don't like, it is not truly the Gospel that you believe, but merely yourself."        

If you merely “draw your own circles,” you may be thought of as an excellent marksman – or a confident, committed disciple of Jesus. But it only proves that you are not nearly as honest with the scriptures as you would have others believe. We would be wise to let God draw the bull’s-eyes.  All of them!
Carl Garner


“The house of delusions is cheap to build, but drafty to live in.”

A. E. Houseman



ARE INFANTS BORN IN SIN?

At least sixty percent of the religious bodies teach that a baby is born in sin. This doctrine is known variously as: original sin, total depravity or the Adamic sin. The Bible does not teach such a doctrine but millions blindly believe it. This is why an unscriptural practice—infant baptism—exists. Men started with a false assumption and added a practice unknown to the holy Word. If we can prove that infants are born pure, sinless, and safe before God, then the rite of sprinkling babies will certainly be proved false. The two ideas go together. If a baby is ushered into life in sin then something must be done to remit that sin or the infant is lost. John Calvin said, “There are some infants in hell not a span long.” Why did he think so? Because Calvin taught that babies enter this world as sinners and if they died prior to being sprinkled they would be lost.

The mode of Bible baptism is immersion (Acts 8:38; Col. 2:12). There is not a single command in the Scriptures for infant baptism. There is not a single example in the New Testament mentioning an infant being “baptized.” In addition to these truths, there are three prerequisites to baptism that an infant cannot do. He cannot believe in Christ, repent of sins or confess Christ (Mark 16:16 Acts 2:38; Acts 8:37). These points prove that infant sprinkling could not be the one baptism mentioned in Ephesians 4:5!

Is it not strange that the Bible does not mention, nor command, nor illustrate, a practice so widely believed in religion? If God had intended such a doctrine to be taught, surely He would have made some provision for it. The silence of the Scriptures on this point speaks loudly. Infants evidently are not born in sin or they would be subjects of New Testament baptism. Here are a few verses that forever prove we are not ushered into life as sinners:

Ezekiel 28:15 “You were perfect in your ways from the day you were created, Till iniquity was found in you.”

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not bear the guilt of the father, nor the father bear the guilt of the son…” 

Hebrews 12:9 and Acts 17:29 – These verses teach that we are “the offspring of God” and that He is the “Father of spirits.” How then could we be born in sin?

Matthew 18:3 “Assuredly, I say to you, unless you are converted and become as little children, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven.” Little children evidently are not sinners or Jesus would not tell us to be like them.

A passage in Psalm 51:5 is often used as proof for infants being born in sin. David said, “Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, And in sin my mother conceived me.” But friends, the sin mentioned here took place before David even existed.

We safely conclude that the Bible does not teach “original sin” or infant baptism. They are doctrines of men and not mandates from heaven.

(taken from the tract, Popular Questions in Religion Answered) Johnny Ramsey

Comments or suggestions: comments@ds-churchofchrist.org
Dead links, typos, or HTML errors: corrections@ds-churchofchrist.org